Should we treat acute HIV infection?

M O'Brien, M Markowitz - Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2012 - Springer
M O'Brien, M Markowitz
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2012Springer
Critical advances in the early diagnosis of HIV now allow for treatment opportunities during
acute infection. It remains unclear whether treatment of acute HIV infection with antiretroviral
therapy improves long-term clinical outcomes for the individual and current guidelines are
not definitive in recommending therapy at this stage of infection. However, treatment of acute
HIV infection may have short-term benefit on viral set point when compared to delayed
therapy as well as reducing the risk of transmission to others. Herein we review the …
Abstract
Critical advances in the early diagnosis of HIV now allow for treatment opportunities during acute infection. It remains unclear whether treatment of acute HIV infection with antiretroviral therapy improves long-term clinical outcomes for the individual and current guidelines are not definitive in recommending therapy at this stage of infection. However, treatment of acute HIV infection may have short-term benefit on viral set point when compared to delayed therapy as well as reducing the risk of transmission to others. Herein we review the immunological and clinical literature to discuss whether we should treat acute HIV infection, both from the perspective of the individual HIV-infected patient and from the public health perspective. As transmission of drug-resistant HIV variants are of concern, we also review recent clinical trial data to provide recommendations for which specific antiretroviral treatment regimens should be considered for the treatment of acute HIV infection.
Springer