Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis

RC Kern, DB Conley, W Walsh… - American journal of …, 2008 - journals.sagepub.com
American journal of rhinology, 2008journals.sagepub.com
Background Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been defined as persistent symptomatic
inflammation of the nasal and sinus mucosa resulting from the interaction of multiple host
and environmental factors. Recent studies have implicated Alternaria fungi or toxigenic
Staphylococcus aureus as critical agents in CRS pathogenesis. The emphasis on
environmental agents in CRS etiology has focused interest toward elimination of those
agents as the prime mechanism of therapy. This viewpoint is in marked contrast to the …
Background
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has been defined as persistent symptomatic inflammation of the nasal and sinus mucosa resulting from the interaction of multiple host and environmental factors. Recent studies have implicated Alternaria fungi or toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus as critical agents in CRS pathogenesis. The emphasis on environmental agents in CRS etiology has focused interest toward elimination of those agents as the prime mechanism of therapy. This viewpoint is in marked contrast to the current perspective on some other chronic inflammatory epithelial disorders that afflict the skin, lungs, and gut, wherein host factors are believed to predispose to disease expression in the presence of ubiquitous environmental agents.
Methods
The current review evaluates CRS etiology from this perspective and considers that CRS develops, in part, as an outcome of a dysfunctional host response. Specifically, evidence from our laboratory and others will be reviewed indicating that CRS is associated with a failure of the mechanical and immunologic barriers across the nasal mucosa. The hypothesis would further propose that genetic and epigenetic variation predisposes susceptible individuals to barrier failure in the presence of environmental stress leading to CRS.
Results
From this unifying perspective, bacteria and fungi are seen as disease modifiers rather than primary etiologic agents.
Conclusion
The goal is to place concepts of CRS pathophysiology in a framework consistent with a current understanding of chronic inflammation in general and epithelial disease in particular.
Sage Journals