CD133 might be a pan marker of epithelial cells with dedifferentiation capacity

D Corbeil, CA Fargeas, J Jászai - Proceedings of the …, 2014 - National Acad Sciences
D Corbeil, CA Fargeas, J Jászai
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014National Acad Sciences
Kusaba et al. provide additional evidence using genetic lineage analysis that epithelial cell
dedifferentiation is responsible for repair of proximal tubules after injury in mouse (1). These
data challenge the hypothesis of the implication of scattered stem cells in such a process or
highlight a potential distinction between rodent and human. To substantiate their conclusion,
the authors evaluated the expression of stem/progenitor (S/P) markers among which is
CD133 (prominin-1), a cell surface antigen whose value in identifying S/P cells in various …
Kusaba et al. provide additional evidence using genetic lineage analysis that epithelial cell dedifferentiation is responsible for repair of proximal tubules after injury in mouse (1). These data challenge the hypothesis of the implication of scattered stem cells in such a process or highlight a potential distinction between rodent and human. To substantiate their conclusion, the authors evaluated the expression of stem/progenitor (S/P) markers among which is CD133 (prominin-1), a cell surface antigen whose value in identifying S/P cells in various organs and neoplastic tissues is the subject of intense investigations. Beside S/P cells, it is documented that CD133 is expressed at the apical membrane of polarized cells found in numerous mouse and human terminally differentiated epithelia, notably kidney proximal tubules (2, 3)(see below). Kusaba et al.(1) surprisingly did not investigate the actual status of the CD133 protein, but instead let their work rely solely on PCR. However, the detection of CD133 transcripts, which may appear as different splice variants, is not necessarily correlated with the expression of its protein product (4). Moreover, the forward primer listed in this study (1) is not specific for CD133; it therefore remains to be determined whether CD133 transcripts are up-regulated in mouse tubular epithelia after injury, and it might be interesting to dissect the expression of CD133 variants within the nephron to see if one (or several) of them is specifically associated with tubular cell repair.
Contrary to the statement of Kusaba et al.(1), anti-mouse CD133 antibodies are commercially available. In fact, the first report on CD133 described not only its cloning from mouse adult kidney cDNA library, but also the characterization of the rat 13A4 monoclonal antibody (mAb)(2). This antibody does not show the apparent S/P cell-restricted pattern of some antibodies directed against human CD133 (eg, AC133 mAb), but is a useful tool to dissect CD133 expression in healthy or damaged murine tissues (2). In normal kidney, 13A4 mAb labels the proximal straight tubules visualized with either a fluorophore-coupled lectin Lotus tetragonolobus agglutinin (LTA) or aquaporin-1 (AQP-1) staining. However, the morphologically defined proximal convoluted tubules seem devoid of 13A4 immunoreactivity (Fig. 1). An up-regulation of murine CD133 in dedifferentiating renal cells needs to be further documented. Although the function of CD133 is unknown, its impact on injury-induced dedifferentiation and repair may be evaluated using the CD133-null mouse line, as demonstrated in the hematopoietic system after myelotoxic stress (5). The abundant expression of CD133 in the healthy kidney questions whether CD133 is solely a marker of rare multipotent renal S/P cells. In other tissues, particularly glandular organs, such as liver, pancreas, and salivary glands, CD133 is physiologically expressed in ductal epithelia (intercalated ducts), which are proposed to host cells with dedifferentiation capacities, and hence, might highlight
National Acad Sciences