ImmunoScore signature: a prognostic and predictive tool in gastric cancer

Y Jiang, QI Zhang, Y Hu, T Li, J Yu, L Zhao, G Ye… - Annals of …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
Y Jiang, QI Zhang, Y Hu, T Li, J Yu, L Zhao, G Ye, H Deng, T Mou, S Cai, Z Zhou, H Liu
Annals of surgery, 2018journals.lww.com
Objective: We postulated that the ImmunoScore (IS) could markedly improve the prediction
of postsurgical survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer (GC). Summary
Background Data: A prediction model for GC patients was developed using data from 879
consecutive patients. Methods: The expression of 27 immune features was detected in 251
specimens by using immunohistochemistry, and a 5-feature-based IS GC was then
constructed using the LASSO Cox regression model. Testing and validation cohorts were …
Abstract
Objective:
We postulated that the ImmunoScore (IS) could markedly improve the prediction of postsurgical survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer (GC).
Summary Background Data:
A prediction model for GC patients was developed using data from 879 consecutive patients.
Methods:
The expression of 27 immune features was detected in 251 specimens by using immunohistochemistry, and a 5-feature-based IS GC was then constructed using the LASSO Cox regression model. Testing and validation cohorts were included to validate the model.
Results:
Using the LASSO model, we established an IS GC classifier based on 5 features: CD3 invasive margin (IM), CD3 center of tumor (CT), CD8 IM, CD45RO CT, and CD66b IM. Significant differences were found between the high-IS GC and low-IS GC patients in the training cohort in 5-year disease-free survival (45.0% vs. 4.4%, respectively; P< 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (48.8% vs. 6.7%, respectively; P< 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the IS GC classifier was an independent prognostic factor. A combination of IS GC and tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) had better prognostic value than TNM stage alone. Further analysis revealed that stage II and III GC patients with high-IS GC exhibited a favorable response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we constructed 2 nomograms to predict which patients with stages II and III GC might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery.
Conclusions:
The IS GC classifier could effectively predict recurrence and survival of GC, and complemented the prognostic value of the TNM staging system. Moreover, the IS GC might be a useful predictive tool to identify stage II and III GC patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins